case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or Woman never approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they might do if they could Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by regulation.
The lots of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made clear that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-subject duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Inside the United States, individuals are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their possess can remember a person rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only to your case, but into the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
However it is made apparent that police is free to take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also assure regard of the family lose in accordance with regulation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security on the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been attained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a precious resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition can be website dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law demands that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party along with the case shall be decided by the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
Any court may perhaps seek to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
States also generally have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, like family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common regulation, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in Big apple will not be binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more